I requested the following: “Please
forward me any documentation in your possession being used to justify Mr.
Quatrone's proposed unused sick day payout.”
Tonight, I finally received
something. Click on the link below:
The cover page claims that this was an
employment contract for 2006-2007 through 2010-2011. But the last page is an attendance calendar
for the 2017-2018 school year. I find it
suspect that the complete contract for that time period was not included.
There is no evidence that an agreement
existed between the Superintendent and the Board regarding Mr. Quatrone's actual number of accumulated days and
their rate valued as of June 8, 2007. No
agreement ever appeared in any contracts thereafter.
What does appear?
I really question the legality of promising
a public employee dental benefits after retirement until their 70th birthday.
What else was the corrupt Board giving
away when nobody was looking?
Lodi’s high taxes didn’t happen by
chance. Lodi pays a corruption tax.
Click below to see what the Board wants to give away
as it raises your taxes tomorrow:
There is no way Mr. Quatrone could have accumulated 212
sick days from the time he became Superintendent until the law capping sick
days took effect. It would be crazy for
a Board to pay him for days as a Gym teacher at a rate of a Superintendent in
the year 2018 or beyond. Besides, that
would have to be spelled out each of his contracts. It isn’t.
Haven't other school employees received a lot less for unused sick days after the caps went into effect? How is the Superintendent any different if his supposed special arrangements were never spelled out in any contracts approved after the law took effect?
Haven't other school employees received a lot less for unused sick days after the caps went into effect? How is the Superintendent any different if his supposed special arrangements were never spelled out in any contracts approved after the law took effect?
