Will the "Movie Screen" Be Used by the "Lead Presenter" & His "Contact Person"?

Will Licata and Ciofalo be using this "movie screen"  for their personal businesses?

It is a slippery slope when any public official feels they have the authority to donate any public property or money to an individual, association, society, or corporation even if it’s a good one.

This was spelled out for other governing bodies in the New Jersey Constitution:

Article VIII, Section 3 of the New Jersey Constitution

SECTION III

2. No county, city, borough, town, township or village shall hereafter give any money or property, or loan its money or credit, to or in aid of any individual, association or corporation, or become security for, or be directly or indirectly the owner of, any stock or bonds of any association or corporation.

3. No donation of land or appropriation of money shall be made by the State or any county or municipal corporation to or for the use of any society, association or corporation whatever.

Did Joe Licata seek this donation?  

Does the movie screen have any value?  

Joe Licata should use his own personal money to repay the Lodi taxpayers for whatever value that is.  

Every time Joe Licata has to abstain is just one more reason why he is unfit to serve on the Board.

To Your Face & Behind Your Back

To Your Face: 

 

Behind Your Back:  

 

So did Marc Schrieks waive his health benefits to grant the taxpayers financial relief or did he only do so because he had another public (political) employer already paying for them?