It continues to be brought to my attention that a large
number of ethics complaints throughout New Jersey are still being driven by Elissa
Mizzone Testa’s dishonest writing titled “Kwapniewski v Curioni”.
If a board member posts anything on social media that
someone doesn’t like, they are now a target of an ethics complaint citing “Kwapniewski
v Curioni”.
If a board member expresses any personal opinion in
any setting about any educational topic, they are now a target of an ethics
complaint citing “Kwapniewski v Curioni”.
We still live in America, and we still have
constitutional rights protecting the expression of free speech, free press, and
the right to assemble.
For any Board Member in New Jersey who has
become a victim of a frivolous ethics complaint in the name of “Kwapniewski v
Curioni” and comes across this blog while doing research, here are facts for
you to consider for your defense:
1) Elissa
Mizzone Testa is a proven liar. She intentionally
lied in saying that the School Ethics Commission found probable cause against
me for my blog posts. After her lie was called out multiple times
even by the SEC itself, she continued with the lie without consequence.
2) Records show
that NJEA Attorney Gail Oxfeld wrote the decision for Elissa Mizzone Testa. Word for word. How has Elissa Mizzone Testa not been fired? How has Elissa Mizzone Testa not been
disbarred?
3) I did NOT participate
in Elissa Mizzone Testa’s hearing. I told
her and her office to correct her lies beforehand and she refused.
4) I represented
myself pro se. I saved Lodi taxpayers $15,000
by refusing to use an insurance provided attorney three times (each time with a
$5,000 deductible for the Lodi taxpayers).
5) My posts in question
are still up today and have been validated.
6) Dominic
Miller and Patricia Licata filed the same ethics complaints against me as Kwapniewski
and the NJEA. The School Ethics
Commission did NOT find probable cause against me for any of the
complaints. Three complaints were filed
targeting my free speech on this blog.
No probable cause was found for any of the three.
7) The School
Ethics commission had rejected Elissa Mizzone Testa’s decision and remanded it
back to her. Click on the link below:
Lodi
By The Numbers: Search results for free speech lives another day
(lodioverhaul.blogspot.com)
8) Elissa
Mizzone Testa did not correct or change anything from her initial decision, yet
the SEC eventually accepted it after documented interference from the Murphy
administration, the Giacobbe firm, and others that had also been exposed for
corruption on this blog.
9) Link to “Exceptions”
submitted:
10) Link to
past posts using the search term “testa”:
Lodi
By The Numbers: Search results for testa (lodioverhaul.blogspot.com)
11) I never faced
one day of suspension while on the Lodi Board of Education. My posts are all still up. I am honored that the NJEA spent six figures
targeting me and that I became such a target of the Murphy administration. What does bother me is that the decision is
being used four years later by communists in government to target the free
speech of others while using the title only without any facts of the case. This is why I am once again posting the facts
for those currently being targeted in the name of “Kwapniewski v
Curioni”.
