Link to Order of Judgment by Judge Toskos:
As you get to the analysis, you can see that the criteria for using “Doctrine of Necessity” was the only thing considered. Wrongdoings and misrepresentations by the
Mayor and Council, Caruso, and Scorzetti were not considered. They were deemed irrelevant to the discussion of “doctrine
of necessity”.
As I am quoted in the decision: “Doctrine of Necessity does not make
conflicts disappear. In fact, it
encourages more nepotism and political patronage. It is a form of legalizing corruption”.