An OPRA response only lists a 40 hour work Monday
through Friday.
Past post on the subject:
Linked below is the hiring resolution in lieu of labor
contract:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O-vwAPLeZBNDydfUtQqtAkPD4mlot1sL/view?usp=sharing
"If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."- George Washington
An OPRA response only lists a 40 hour work Monday
through Friday.
Past post on the subject:
Linked below is the hiring resolution in lieu of labor
contract:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O-vwAPLeZBNDydfUtQqtAkPD4mlot1sL/view?usp=sharing
Vinny Martin lists that he is a retired Sergeant of
Lodi Police Department. He knew exactly
what he was doing and not doing when he chose the manager of his business.
These are Vinny Martin’s hiring practices. Keep that in mind when you look at the
noncompetitive town contracts being awarded by Vinny Martin, the no show jobs, and the
rampant fraud, waste and abuse that add a very high corruption tax on the
taxpayers of Lodi.
You can’t flip a switch to behave one way in real life
and then the total opposite when you enter Borough Hall.
Vinny Martin really wanted Donald Scorzetti to be Lodi Police Chief and got him a lot of special treatment to get there. Donald Scorzetti should address each of the 22 charges listed in the previous post and explain why he didn't have a problem with any of them. Would he feel the same if those crimes were committed in Lodi instead of Secaucus? Very likely. Vinny Martin's "business partner" was running a "strip joint" in Lodi during the same time period.
The State's Division of Alcohol Beverage Control filed to revoke Vinny Martin's license and bar him from holding a license for two years.
Vinny Martin and his partner settled before the hearing.
How can the State list pages of crimes committed without charging the owner?How can the State not allow Vinny Martin to continue running his business but still allow him to run Lodi?
Why hasn't one news reporter confronted Matthew Platkin about this blatant abuse and political favoritism?
Post Date: November 1, 2025
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dARLs_lIV8H5co1tX0hr9ILyKyzT8tq9/view?usp=sharing
During the years of violations and proceedings, Vinny Martin was listed as 50% owner and Managing Member of See Entertainment.
Post Date: July 7, 2025The email submitted to vmartin@lodi-nj.org is now a public
record. If a conflict of interest exists,
the public record will show that Vinny Martin refused to disclose it to the
public.
The Borough should remove the link vmartin@lodi-nj.org from its website if
Vinny Martin does not want to hear from any residents. The link vmartin@lodi-nj.org
should be removed if Vinny Martin is incapable of answering the most simple,
straightforward questions.
This blog has shown over the years that the Lodi mayor
and council, its Borough Attorney Alan Spiniello, and others have been using their
personal emails (not those listed on the Borough website) to conduct Borough business
so their unlawful actions and bad behavior would be hidden from the public record. Being they use their personal emails for official borough business; they should explain what their town emails are used for.
A post by the Comptroller's Office Today:
https://lodioverhaul.blogspot.com/2023/07/has-your-municipality-adopted-vehicle.html
Is going to the shore like a personal errand:
Is going to a bar like a personal errand:
Please download these attachments from the links below:
For how many years did Sharon Salvacion receive a special December Christmas present from the Lodi taxpayers which was unlawful? How many tens of thousands of dollars did it add up to? How much was she paid after the laws went into effect but before I began posting payroll?
A very quick blog search showed the following:
December 2020
Sharon Salvacion should return all money she unlawfully received. It belongs to the Lodi taxpayers.
Many Lodi taxpayers saw a $1000 municipal tax increase
last year. Sharon Salvacion did
not.
Matthew Giacobbe (using Strauss Esmay) misled Boards of Education throughout NJ into passing radical transgender Policy 5756. Then Giacobbe got rich off of the Hanover taxpayers to repeal that very same policy. In 2023, Matthew Giacobbe billed the Hanover Board of Education $111,141. You saw an August bill spike to $28,474 when the monthly bills were around $4,000 at the start of that year. I saw first-hand how Giacobbe was playing both sides of the issue and cashing in big time so I OPRAed his 2023 bills in Hanover. The Hanover BA took 53 days to fulfill my OPRA request and the bills are badly redacted. I received the bills right after my blog of over 10 years was suddenly removed. Link to Giacobbe’s 2023 bills for the Hanover BOE (Giacobbe begins on page 4):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17VyJMt9L3G_crPaBRjF4t4ns2cqZVFPw/view?usp=sharing
Post date: April 9, 2024
https://lodioverhaul.blogspot.com/search?q=Karen+viscana&m=1