A batch of emails I received today show that Michael Yaple asked Kathryn Whalen over and over again for a copy of a School Ethics Decision against me leading up to the November 5, 2019 Election. Above is one of many requests from Michel Yaple. The date of that request is November 4, 2019. Michael Yaple wanted to get a decision against me to a “reporter” one day before the Election. In prior emails, Michael Yaple clearly stated he wanted to get a copy to a "reporter" because no decision was posted. No decision was posted because none existed.
The problem with Michael Yaple’s multiple requests is that there never was any SEC decision against me at any time before the November 5, 2019 Election.
When Michael Yaple was requesting an SEC decision
against me during the summer of 2019, Kathryn Whalen explained that the School Ethics
Commission would be making a decision on August 27th. On August 27th, the SEC remanded the
case back to Elissa Mizzone Testa. The
SEC corrected Testa for false statements and wrote a response favorable to
me. Of course, Michael Yaple wouldn’t
want to hand a copy of that to a "reporter". Click
on the links below to see what happened on August 27, 2019:
Lodi By
The Numbers: The Truth Matters... (lodioverhaul.blogspot.com)
Michael Yaple was back asking Kathryn Whalen
for an SEC decision against me one day before the Election.
Kathryn Whalen responded after Election Day that the SEC would be making
a decision on December 17, 2019. Michael
Yaple was seeking an SEC decision on November 4, 2019 that didn’t exist.
Once again, there never was an SEC decision against me
before November 5, 2019.
What Records Did Exist Prior to November
5, 2019 that Michael Yaple Never Sought to Get to a Reporter:
- Three SEC decisions
that found NO PROBABLE CAUSE that my blog posts violated any ethics codes
(including Kwanpniewski’s complaint).
- Multiple Administrative
Judges that would NOT GRANT what Debra Kwapniewksi and others were seeking against
me for blog posts. Multiple judges had
the same complaint that eventually went to Elissa Mizzone Testa. The other ALJs wouldn’t do what Testa did because
they likely didn’t want to appear dirty, corrupt, unprofessional, and overly
political. Most judges wouldn’t want to
use an opinion written word for word by an NJEA lawyer.
What Did Michael Yaple Never Request from
Kathryn Whalen?
- The SEC
Decision against Joseph Licata.
- The TWO
SEC Decisions against Dominic Miller.
- The SEC
Decision against Michael Nardino.
What Else Did Michael Yaple Never Get to
Reporters?
- Copies of the multiple OFAC reports and corrective
action plans (All of the district’s violations that required corrective action
plans were initiated by me and my personal investigations which handed over so
much substantial evidence to the State that it had to act).
The multiple emails from Michael Yaple leading up to the Election show that he had a sick obsession with me. Some of his emails about me were redacted so I
didn’t bother posting them. What was he
saying about me? Kathryn Whalen even had
to ask him in one email which board member he was referring to because obviously
there were SEC decisions against other Lodi board members and not me. Michael Yaple only responded with one
name: Ryan Curioni.
The reporter in question likely is Katie Sobko. She never reported on any decisions against
any of the other Lodi board members that committed real ethics violations. She never reported on any
of the OFAC reports that occurred while she was covering Lodi. She never reported on Tony Luna and Charles
Cuccia being found guilty of ethics violations and being fined by the
State. Why? Because the NJEA didn’t want
Katie Sobko to report on those stories.
Katie Sobko is a biased reporter. She is a left-wing activist. Most people are cancelling subscriptions to her paper.
