Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Was New Jersey’s Open Public Meetings Act Violated Tonight?




This administration planned to discuss their “Annual Municipal Audit” tonight which included the auditor’s recommendations.  A vote to approve this audit is scheduled for their next regular council meeting (Resolution No. 13-178). 

At first, the public was told that the audit would be discussed when the auditor arrived and that he was running late.  Then, at some point, Marc Schrieks asked the Borough Attorney, Alan Spiniello, if the discussion should go into closed session.  Mr. Spiniello said he would have to ask the auditor, Mr. DiMaria.

As Mr. DiMaria entered the meeting at approximated 6:47 p.m., Mr. Spiniello intercepted him at the door and had a few words with him outside the meeting room.

 After they both reentered the meeting and took their seats, Mr. Spiniello asked Mr. DiMaria if they should go into “closed session” and if the audit included any litigation.  Mr. DiMaria responded “Yes”.  The council voted to go into “closed session” and the public was asked to leave meeting.

 There are many problems with what occurred tonight.  Discussing the auditor’s recommendations may not make this administration look good but it does not meet any criteria for a “closed session”.  If litigation was the concern, Mr. Spiniello would have been able to make a definitive decision on the matter.  He would not intercept the auditor outside and ask him to make the call.  Using “litigation” as an excuse  was beyond a stretch.  Nothing from the auditor’s report was discussed tonight.  The entire auditor’s report is not “litigation”.  "Recommendations" are not "litigation."

The public needs to realize that this council did not discuss any of the auditor’s recommendations last year at any regular council meetings.  They probably discussed them upstairs when nobody was present.  This year, they did not have the luxury of not having anybody from the public present at their “Executive Meeting”. 

 “Closed Sessions” should not be used casually and the law should be cited directly when doing so.  This anti-transparency government cannot pick and choose what to discuss at public meetings.  They need to follow the law.  The public can read New Jersey’s Open Public Meetings Act (“Sunshine Law”) below to see that an auditor’s report does not meet any criteria for a “closed session”.  Was proper protocol followed? 


 

CLOSED SESSIONS: Closed or “executive” sessions may be held without public notice, or during the course of a public meeting, provided that the subject matter is covered by one or more of the following legal exemptions:


·       Matters made confidential by state, federal law or rule by court.

·        Disclosure would result in an unwarranted invasion of individual privacy, unless the person affected consents in writing.
·        Disclosure would impair the body's right to receive federal or state funds.
·       Collective bargaining.
·       Lease or acquisition of property, setting of banking rates, investment of public funds if disclosure would harm the public interest.
·        Investigations into violations of law.
·        Strategies to protect public security.
·        Pending, ongoing or anticipated litigation or contract negotiation, including attorney-client privilege. The threat of litigation must be more than theoretical for this exemption to apply.
·       Personnel matters affecting employees of the public bodies, unless all parties request or consent to a public hearing. Prior to discussion of personnel, affected employees must be given notice, known as a Rice notice, which gives the employee the right to request a public hearing.
·        Proceedings that could result in a suspension, civil penalty, or loss of a license or permit.
 
 
• Closed sessions are limited to discussion; all formal actions must be made in the open, regardless of subject matter.
 
 
• Prior to any closed session, the body must adopt a resolution stating the general nature of the subject to be discussed and the time when the discussion can be disclosed. The precise nature of the matter discussed may be withheld until the need for the closed session has passed.
 
 
MINUTES: Minutes must be kept of closed sessions. The minutes should start with a statement of the time, place and manner of notice, or in the case of an emergency meeting, a statement sufficient to satisfy the emergency meeting notice requirements. Minutes should show, at a minimum, the names of the members present, individual votes of each member, subjects considered and actions taken. Minutes must be promptly made available once the necessity of the closed session has passed.