Link to article on northjersey.com:
From the article:
“It
is an extraordinarily expensive commitment that the citizens of Hackensack
would be approving,” De La Cruz said in court. “And I believe under these
circumstances the citizens of Hackensack deserve to have an actual, accurate
language on their ballot to reflect the expense that they are expected to
bear.”
And,
“The judge added a second caveat to the court order. She asked that the
school board refrain from advocating in support of or opposition to the ballot
measure — something that Cramer had requested, but that attorneys representing
the school board argued the board had not done.
“I am also concerned about the potential of the Board of Education
engaging in some sort of advocacy in support of the question,” De La Cruz said.”
