Did Joe Licata break the law by signing fake
invoices and receiving payments for services not rendered?
Or did Joe Licata break the law by refusing to
produce financial reports after they were requested through the Open Public Records
Act?
Most people knew that there
was no “sixth quarter financial report”. Most knew that
politicians don’t get paid “consulting fees” for attending “TIPS”, a free
training session for those serving alcohol.
Most
expected that Joe Licata was doing very little if not nothing at all for his
“consulting fees”.
But Joe Licata took things
to a whole new level this week.
Here are #3 and #4 requested through
the Open Public Records Act”:
3)
A copy of all Lodi Municipal Alliance financial reports completed by Joseph
Licata for the 2014 Calendar year.
4)
A copy of all Municipal Alliance meeting minutes for the 2014 Calendar
Year.
By not submitting any
financial reports in response to an OPRA request, he is making the claim that
none exist. Because if they did exist, he just
violated the Open Public Records Act.
If none
exist, what has he been paid thousands for?
He contradicted himself, Mike Nardino, and the Mayor and Council. He
contradicted the invoice that contains his signature.
Who would have thought that
the Lodi Municipal Alliance was being run as such a shady operation?
Here are just
a few violations:
1) Mike Nardino stated at a meeting that they don’t have minutes. Joe Licata claimed the same with the above OPRA response.
Violation:
“MACs must operate
in full compliance with the State’s open public meetings laws. There must be public notice of MAC
meetings. Minutes must be kept of all Committee meetings, and a quorum of Committee members is
required for action to be taken by the Committee (e.g., approval of plan or
modifications). A quorum is 50 percent of the official Committee membership
plus one.”
2) The Lodi Mayor and Council claim that they don’t know who is on the committee. Mike Nardino couldn’t name who is currently on the committee either.
The Mayor
and Council have not appointed anyone to the MAC (according to their own
meeting minutes or anyone in attendance at council meetings).
Violation:
“For participation in the Alliance
Network to Prevent Alcoholism and Drug Abuse, the governing body of
a municipality must appoint a Municipal Alliance Committee (MAC), or join with
one or more municipalities to form an Alliance consortium to which they appoint
municipal representatives.
3) #5 of the Above OPRA request: “A copy of any municipal ordinance or resolution establishing its Municipal Alliance Committee (MAC)."
The
Borough’s response is an old Resolution from 1990:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/251422094/Drug-Alliance-Resolution
https://www.scribd.com/doc/251422094/Drug-Alliance-Resolution
Violation:
“MACs must be established by
municipal ordinance or resolution, and the committee must adopt bylaws. If a municipality chooses to use resolutions they must be adopted
annually in order to be in effect.”
4) Have Joe Licata and Jaime Ciofalo recused themselves when their conduct resulted in financial game?
Who
knows? They don’t keep minutes and
nobody knows if any meetings even took place?
Nobody knows who is even on the committee
Violation:
“A conflict of
interest may exist if a MAC member can reasonably expect that their conduct
will directly result in a personal or financial benefit to themselves, their
family members, business associates, employers, or to businesses that the
member represents. In situations where a conflict of interest may
exist, the MAC member must recuse him or herself. Recusal means that the
individual is not participating in deliberations or debates, making
recommendations, giving advice, considering findings, voting or in any other
way assuming responsibility for or participating in any aspect of the decision
making regarding the matter. Consultants or providers who are directly or
indirectly involved in providing prevention services to the Municipal Alliance
are also subject to the recusal requirement.”
5) Joe Licata is claiming in the OPRA response that no financial reports were completed by him for the 2014 Calendar Year.
Violation:
The Alliance Coordinator is responsible for the
administrative duties of the of the Alliance such as completing required
reports and applications for alliance funding, scheduling consults and
providing support to the Municipal Alliance Committee (a Municipal Alliance
Coordinator job description is on file in the municipality).
All of the above quotes were taken
directly from here:
Look at what Joe Licata has done with an $8,758.00
Municipal Alliance Grant. Just imagine what he is doing with a $58,000,000.00
school Budget.