Wednesday, August 30, 2017

The Board voted to submit two questions to the School Ethics Commission seeking advisory opinions…





Two questions have lingered on for months so the board finally voted to seek advisory opinions:


1)     Can the two board members without conflicts negotiate the superintendent’s contract?


In the past, contracts have been negotiated by one or two board members.  All of a sudden, certain people want to allow the entire board to negotiate the superintendent’s contract.  Six members have conflicts that should prohibit them from negotiations.  Some past posts on the subject:






2)     Can board members and/or a personnel committee view resumes of applicants or finalists for school positions? 
        

The board attorney advised that a personnel committee can only view the one resume of an individual chosen by the superintendent for any position.  The committee was told that it cannot even see the resumes of the finalists for any position. 
        

Hypothetical:  What if a board member’s relative is recommended for a promotion (as it has been done so often in the past)?  The board and the personnel committee would be told that they cannot see who else applied, what their backgrounds were, or what was listed on their resumes.  The board would vote on appointing the relative without knowing if the process was fair or if there were better candidates.