Link to story:
From the article:
“Giacobbe
writes in the motion to dismiss that those who filed the complaint aim to
“create a chilling effect for both board members and scholars such as Aziz from
engaging in actions and speech that are within their First Amendment rights.””
The Board member
being defended by Giacobbe clearly shared disgusting, antisemitic beliefs. Being she is a Rutgers Law Professor does not
make it any better. Many professors are hate
filled whackos.
Matthew Giacobbe
clearly has no problem defending antisemitism as long as he can make money
doing so.
Matthew Giacobbe is a
big hypocrite on most subjects but especially free speech.
After I exposed
Matthew Giacobbe’s dishonest practices and billing on this blog, he tried to
have the Lodi Board of Education hire his former law partner to go after my
blog one week before an Election. Of
course, using Lodi tax dollars.
Giacobbe’s bills approved by the Lodi Board of Education also
show that he had Mark Wenzcel contacting Kathryn Whalen at the School Ethics
about my blog after the SEC had been siding with me and before it flipped.
Summary:
Matthew Giacobbe believes the post below is NOT a First Amendment right for Board members. This blog post
set him on the war path to go after me and this blog:
Matthew Giacobbe believes that posting Antisemitic statements and even signing the documents described
below is a First Amendment right of Board members:
“The complaint also argues the board vice president’s signing of a document called “Palestine & Praxis: Scholars for Palestinian Freedom” shows “hatred and prejudice against Israelis, Jews and people supportive of the existence of the Jewish state (i.e., Zionists).” The signed document includes a commitment to “pressuring our academic institutions and organizations to respect the Palestinian call for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions of Israel.”
