Monday, August 31, 2026

Joseph Lagana’s Largest Reported Campaign Contribution Last Month Came from “MORGAN AND MORGAN”. Lagana Should Disclose How Much Personal Injury Legislation or Commerce Committee Actions One Can Purchase for $10,000.

Link to Lagana’s July 16, 2026 Filing:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iNS0-hmW8aYn96A2SuvXkbBf_aLZC8EU/view?usp=sharing

Joseph Lagana advertises on his firm’s site that he concentrates on personal injury protection (PIP) litigation.

Joseph Lagana sponsors and pushes a lot of legislation dealing with personal injury.

Jospeh Lagana should explain why “Morgan and Morgan” was his largest campaign contributor last month.  He should also explain why New Jersey insurance rates have gotten so much worse because of his legislation, votes, and committee assignments.

What does Joseph Lagana have to say to his constituents that can't afford their insurances which are only getting more expensive because of the direct actions of their State Senator who legislates with clear self-serving conflicts of interest?



As Charlatan Attorneys Like Matthew Giacobbe Guide BOE's to Violate Constitutional Rights, Here is an Important Wall Street Op-ed to Consider from an America First Legal (AFL) Attorney...

Parents, Know Your Rights as School Begins

By Ian Prior

If you have school-age children, you may be worrying about what your kids will be exposed to when class resumes. Will teachers ask them for “preferred pronouns,” rather than teach them standard English? If your son is confused about his sex, will the school encourage him in the belief that he is a girl and conceal it from you? Will your daughters be forced to share a locker room with boys? More generally, will the school propagandize your children about controversial social topics without your knowledge or consent?

These are real dangers that are the subject of school board battles, federal investigations and lawsuits across the country, as parents increasingly challenge policies that infringe on their authority and they believe harm their children.

The good news is that parents are no longer powerless. Recent Supreme Court decisions, combined with an administration committed to enforcing federal law, have significantly strengthened parental rights. Here’s what you need to know as your children go back to school:

You have the right to opt out. In Mahmoud v. Taylor (2025), the justices held that the Montgomery County, Md., public schools had violated parents’ First Amendment rights by refusing to provide notice and opportunity to opt out of instruction involving “LGBTQ+-inclusive” storybooks for parents who objected on religious grounds.

This March, in Mirabelli v. Bonta, the court issued an unsigned order that further reinforced those protections. The justices said that a school’s facilitation of a child’s “gender transition” without parental consent likely violates the parents’ right to direct their children’s upbringing and education. Taken together, these decisions make clear that school districts must provide parents the ability to opt their children out of sex-related policies the parents find objectionable.

America First Legal has made available an opt-out template letter for parents to personalize and send to their children’s school demanding that schools comply with their requests on these issues. Courts will treat failure to comply with these requests as an unconstitutional deprivation of a parent’s constitutional rights.

The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act gives parents the right to their children’s records. Ferpa, which Congress enacted in 1974, provides parents the right to inspect “records, files, documents, and other materials which contain information directly related” to their children. This extremely broad definition may include records related to “gender identity,” including the use of different names or pronouns that don’t match the child’s sex. Schools that fail to comply with Ferpa can lose federal funding.

Many school districts intentionally keep records related to a student’s “gender identity” in a separate system precisely to prevent parents

from accessing them. This practice has led the Education Department to launch investigations and refer enforcement actions to the Justice Department. Parents seeking their children’s educational records should therefore clearly state that the request is being made under Ferpa, and they should specifically demand that all records related to “gender identity” be included. If the school denies any part of the request or is clearly withholding records, parents should file a formal complaint with the Education Department.

Parents have the right to review curriculum under the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment. The PPRA, which became law in 1978, gives parents the right to inspect instructional materials used in connection with their child’s education. Unlike a typical public-records request, PPRA prohibits schools from imposing fees. The statute also generally prohibits schools from requiring students to answer surveys concerning highly personal subjects relating to the student or his family—including political beliefs, religious beliefs, mental or psychological issues, sexual behavior, finances or other sensitive matters— without parental consent.

America First Legal has a PPRA toolkit with more information and a sample demand letter to schools to ensure that parents’ rights under PPRA are respected.

Title IX protects sex-separated spaces. This provision of the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits discrimination “on the basis of sex,” and it applies to all schools that receive federal funds. In June of this year, the Supreme Court held in B.P.J. v. West Virginia that the term “sex” as used in Title IX and its regulations “cannot plausibly be interpreted to refer to anything other than biological sex.”

As a result, schools can’t credibly claim that Title IX requires them to permit students to access oppositesex restrooms or locker rooms. The Education Department has made clear that this is a violation of Title IX. Parents who are confronted with this situation can file a Title IX complaint with the Education Department or directly sue the school system on their child’s behalf under Title IX.

America’s schools exist to educate children, not to replace parents. The Constitution and federal statutes— bolstered by recent Supreme Court decisions and Trump administration regulations—guarantee that parents have the primary responsibility for directing their children’s upbringing.

But legal rights mean little if parents don’t exercise them. As students return to school this fall, parents should know they have the power to exercise their rights, ask questions, request records, review instructional materials, and insist that schools respect the cherished role our Constitution assigns to families, not government officials.

Mr. Prior is senior counsel at America First Legal and the author of “Parents of the World Unite.” 

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Lawsuit Against the Chatham Board of Education Further Spotlights Matthew Giacobbe's Double Standards and Double Dealings. School Law Should Be Based on Law. It Should Be the Same Whether You are in Chatham or Hanover.

Link to new jersey globe story:

Moms for Liberty sues Chathams school district over transgender student policy - New Jersey Globe

Who is Board Attorney for Chatham? Of course, Matthew Giacobbe.

From Chatham's April Reorganization Minutes

The same Matthew Giacobbe taking the complete opposite position in Hanover and making a real lot of money doing so.

Past posts on hypocrite Matthew Giacobbe and Hanover:

Lodi By The Numbers: Search results for giacobbe hanover

Matthew Giacobbe doesn’t do law.  Matthew Giacobbe does money. 

Past posts about Matthew Giacobbe and Strauss Esmay:

https://lodioverhaul.blogspot.com/search?q=Esmay&m=1


Sunday, August 23, 2026

The Lodi BOE Should Explain the Last Item They Tried to Hide on the Bottom of this Week’s Meeting Agenda. Why Did So Many Lodi Students Need an "Alternative Competency Assessment" to Meet the State's Very Low Graduation Standards? Why Did So Many Lodi Students Fail the Grade 11 New Jersey Graduation Proficiency Assessment?

 

The State of New Jersey has really low graduation standards (no standards) which worsened during the Murphy years when the NJEA occupied his office (literally occupied his office). With that said, Lodi is showing that a large percentage of students needed an alternative competency assessment to meet "graduation standards".  

Why does the State bother to require an 11th grade proficiency assessment when the results are totally meaningless?  It's clearly not a graduation requirement when more than half of Lodi students can't pass one of its subject areas.

Lodi has its own no fail policy absent the State’s "proficiency" assessment.  The only way a student doesn't graduate is if they drop out.  Many high school teachers resigned in recent years and stated the reason was all the extra work and time spent on the meaningless no fail accommodations that only resulted in students caring less and doing less.

The Lodi Board of Education sent out its glossy newsletter this summer produced by a public relations firm all paid for with Lodi tax dollars.  Nancy Cardone placed her photo on the front page and throughout.  All using Lodi tax dollars. All while enriching herself and family at the expense of student achievement.

Lodi’s BOE budget is approaching $100,000,000.  Lodi taxpayers should demand much more.

Lodi By The Numbers: Lodi’s BOE Budget is Approaching $100,000,000. Spending Has Increased $33,047,733 Since the 2019-2020 School Year. All While the Public Has Never Been Provided a Detailed Budget and All BOE Members are Claiming to Vote on These Increases Without Seeing a Detailed Budget.

Link to August 26th agenda:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gRNc2VEyyEXispHJECpqZhdbWCG4yfCB/view?usp=sharing

Most people are unaware of what a joke the alternative pathways really are.





Sunday, August 16, 2026

Many Lodi Residents Have Asked Me if Scott Luna Has a Set Work Schedule with the Lodi Housing Authority Being He Conducts Borough Business in His Capacity as "Lodi Mayor" During the Work Days and Times of a Typical Housing Employee...

An OPRA response only lists a 40 hour work Monday through Friday.

Past post on the subject:

Lodi By The Numbers: Lodi Mayor Scott Luna Appointed the Lodi Housing Commissioners. Then Scott Luna Had His Appointees Create a New Position for Him and Start Him at $125,000.

Linked below is the hiring resolution in lieu of labor contract:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O-vwAPLeZBNDydfUtQqtAkPD4mlot1sL/view?usp=sharing 



#4 of “NOTICE OF CHARGES SEEKING REVOCATION” Should Provide Insight into Lodi Deputy Mayor Vinny Martin’s Hiring Practices…

Vinny Martin lists that he is a retired Sergeant of Lodi Police Department.  He knew exactly what he was doing and not doing when he chose the manager of his business.

These are Vinny Martin’s hiring practices.  Keep that in mind when you look at the noncompetitive town contracts being awarded by Vinny Martin, the no show jobs, and the rampant fraud, waste and abuse that add a very high corruption tax on the taxpayers of Lodi. 

You can’t flip a switch to behave one way in real life and then the total opposite when you enter Borough Hall.



Saturday, August 15, 2026

Donald Scorzetti Should Address Each of the 22 Charges Listed in the Previous Post and Explain Why He Was Attending Vinny Martin's Political Fundraiser and Displaying Vinny Martin Lawn Signs During that Time Period in 2023?

Donald Scorzetti Attending a 2023 Vinny Martin Political Fundraiser 

Vinny Martin really wanted Donald Scorzetti to be Lodi Police Chief and got him a lot of special treatment to get there. Donald Scorzetti should address each of the 22 charges listed in the previous post and explain why he didn't have a problem with any of them. Would he feel the same if those crimes were committed in Lodi instead of Secaucus? Very likely. Vinny Martin's "business partner" was running a "strip joint" in Lodi during the same time period.







There Were At Least 22 Charges Listed When the State Was Revoking Vinny Martin's Business License. Vinny Should Address Each Charge Individually and Explain Why Each Charge Should Not Disqualify Him from Public Office. Have You Ever Seen a Public Official Get Away With So Much Without Answering for Anything? Every News Reporter that Covered the Multiple Prostitution/Drug Busts at Martin's Business Failed Badly by Not Naming the Owner, Questioning Him, and Seeking any Answers. Were They Intimidated or Incompetent?.




Vincent Martin (Lodi's Deputy Mayor and Controversial Planning Board Member Responsible for Overdevelopment Monstrosities, Developer Funded Campaigns, Excessive Variances in Return for Payment, etc) Was a "50% Owner" and "Managing Member" of "AJ's" When it Was Repeatedly Busted for Prostitution and Illegal Drugs. Vinny Martin Settled Before the Hearing to Revoke His License and Bar Him from Holding a License for Two Years.

The State's Division of Alcohol Beverage Control filed to revoke Vinny Martin's license and bar him from holding a license for two years.

Vinny Martin and his partner settled before the hearing. 

How can the State list pages of crimes committed without charging the owner? 

How can the State not allow Vinny Martin to continue running his business but still allow him to run Lodi?

Why hasn't one news reporter confronted Matthew Platkin about this blatant abuse and political favoritism?


Post Date: November 1, 2025



Lodi Deputy Mayor Vincent Martin Has Not Been Honest with the Residents of Lodi About His Involvement with the Charges Listed Below. These Proceedings Were All Taking Place While He was Lodi Deputy Mayor. He Was Never Mentioned in One News Story and No State Agency Informed the Residents of Lodi. If the State Was Revoking His License, He Was Not Fit to Serve on Our Council.


Link to document that the above screenshots were taken:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dARLs_lIV8H5co1tX0hr9ILyKyzT8tq9/view?usp=sharing

During the years of violations and proceedings, Vinny Martin was listed as 50% owner and Managing Member of See Entertainment.

Post Date: July 7, 2025

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

On Sunday, a Question Was Emailed to Vinny Martin Giving Him an Opportunity to Disclose a Possible Conflict of Interest. There Has Been No Response.

The email submitted to vmartin@lodi-nj.org is now a public record.  If a conflict of interest exists, the public record will show that Vinny Martin refused to disclose it to the public.

The Borough should remove the link vmartin@lodi-nj.org from its website if Vinny Martin does not want to hear from any residents.  The link vmartin@lodi-nj.org should be removed if Vinny Martin is incapable of answering the most simple, straightforward questions.

This blog has shown over the years that the Lodi mayor and council, its Borough Attorney Alan Spiniello, and others have been using their personal emails (not those listed on the Borough website) to conduct Borough business so their unlawful actions and bad behavior would be hidden from the public record.  Being they use their personal emails for official borough business; they should explain what their town emails are used for.



Maybe the Comptroller's Office Can Tell the Lodi Mayor and Council this Groundbreaking Information....

 A post by the Comptroller's Office Today:


The Lodi Mayor and Council on the Subject:

https://lodioverhaul.blogspot.com/2023/07/has-your-municipality-adopted-vehicle.html

Is going to the shore like a personal errand:

Is going to a bar like a personal errand:




Sunday, August 9, 2026

For a Second Month in a Row, Vinny Martin Abstained on Neglia's Bills. The Lodi Mayor and Council Owe the Public an Explanation. Does Vinny Martin Have another Conflict of Interest and When Did it Begin?



July 2026 Payroll for Lodi Borough Hall...

 


Link to July 15th Payroll:

Link to July 30th Payroll:



July 2026 Resolutions for the Lodi Mayor and Council...

 Please download these attachments from the links below:


July 2026 Bills for the Lodi Mayor and Council...

 


Link to July Bills: